- As discussed before I will have 5 open positions per year
- Assume I will catch 40% of the stocks move
- Assume I will have a 2:1 losers to winners ratio per year
- I will always cut my losses at 10%
- Both losers always come before the losers
I want to use this as an example to see if it would have been possible to live off the money made in the stock market if you started at any particular year. I have created two tables that highlight how you would have done had you averaged the performance of the 5 most winning stocks and 10 most winning stocks.
5 Most Winning Stocks
10 Most Winning Stocks
As you can see from these tables, if you had been comfortable living on 35k or less per year, there would have been only two years in which you would not have been able to pay for yourself. Although I personally would much rather live on more than 35k per year, it is definitely possible. I have also presented one of the worse scenarios.
Another method to see if it is possible is to assume we can increase our odds of being in the upper 80% of all stocks on a yearly basis. The returns for that are outlined in the table below:
So, if we had been able to stay in the 80% for returns on a yearly basis we would have been able to live off the returns for 12 of the last 15 years.
Before we can claim that it is possible to live off the returns, we need to understand the things that make these stocks different or stand out from the crowd. What godly qualities do they posses that allow them to outperform the other stocks in the marketplace. That is the discussion for the next post!
No comments:
Post a Comment